RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/14/2014

It's official: Out-of-state NOM can't stick discriminatory noses in Beaver State's business

by Jeremy Hooper

I haven't read the ruling yet, but here's the big headline:

Judge denies NOM right to defend Oregon's marriage laws [Statesman Journal]

Ya know, if an accountant were as bad at adding and subtracting as NOM is at achieving success on behalf of its movement, he or she would be forced out of the industry. Just saying.

6A00D8341C503453Ef01A73D8266Ad970D-23

**UPDATE: NOM is planning to appeal to the 9th Circuit. Which is kind of like saying the National Org. For Pigs plans to plead to the Federal Aviation Administration for flight clearance.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails