RECENT  POSTS:  » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/14/2014

It's official: Out-of-state NOM can't stick discriminatory noses in Beaver State's business

by Jeremy Hooper

I haven't read the ruling yet, but here's the big headline:

Judge denies NOM right to defend Oregon's marriage laws [Statesman Journal]

Ya know, if an accountant were as bad at adding and subtracting as NOM is at achieving success on behalf of its movement, he or she would be forced out of the industry. Just saying.

6A00D8341C503453Ef01A73D8266Ad970D-23

**UPDATE: NOM is planning to appeal to the 9th Circuit. Which is kind of like saying the National Org. For Pigs plans to plead to the Federal Aviation Administration for flight clearance.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails