RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: AFA's Fischer urges FLOTUS to fight obesity by fighting lesbians' sexual orientation » Um, but he lost to another pro-equality candidate, Tony » Video: Man misapplies personal trauma to sexual orientation science » WND's editor fundamentally misunderstands nondiscrimination law (part 3 of 3) » Video: Why is this shockingly anti-gay (among other things) speech happening in a Connecticut public school? » Fined NY event space to host same-sex wedding receptions (*but no ceremonies for anyone) » Another day, another far-right pastor pushing Christians to civil war » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/22/2014

NOM's 'March for Marriage' cosponsor states, as fact, that same-sex marriage 'will lead to group marriage'

by Jeremy Hooper

They've gone beyond the slippery slope fears. The Coalition of African-American pastors, a partner of the National Organization For Marriage and a cosponsor of NOM's upcoming March for Marriage, is now going ahead and laming that group marriages are, in fact, in the pipe and that we marriage equality advocates are trying to hide that "fact":

They understand their own weaknesses. They realize that any discussion of a societal redefinition of marriages is a slippery slope to practices and couplings that the public is not willing to support. They know they're not going to get same sex marriage passed if the public realizes that it will lead to group marriages.
[SOURCE: CAAP fundraising email, which also promotes NOM's march]

Well of course the public won't get behind us if they "realize" that! It will lead to so much confusion about how many wedding gifts you're required to buy. Two toasters? Three waffle irons? Who wants that headache? Especially if there's only one cake.

Fortunately, despite the social conservatives' mind-numbingly anti-intellectual attempts to pin any and every possible variation of marriage onto us, the fact is that same-sex marriage advocates have that one and only limited cause pertaining to the institution, with any potential variance (and as long there is human intuition, there is of course potential, with or without SSM) left to that particular movement to justify under law. Any that do succeed will do so because of merit, not because we gay folk are the keys that open Pandora's Box. If marriage is such a box, it is so because the institution itself exists, not because we are included within it.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails