RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Ex-gay' org. excited to be 'featured exhibitor' at #VVS14 » Three of history's four women Supreme Court Justices have now performed same-sex weddings » GLAAD: Questions we'd like reporters to ask at the Values Voter Summit » HA! Robert Oscar Lopez mentions me in truly bizarre amicus brief to 5th Circuit » Gay man realizes he shouldn't have entered an opposite-sex union—so no same-sex marriage for anyone?! » Your daily 'Gay Gestapo' moment with the American Family Association's senior analyst » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/05/2014

Read: Attorney General on why out-of-state NOM should keep its standing-deprived nose out of Oregon's business

by Jeremy Hooper

As you surely know, the National Organization For Marriage is trying to step into Oregon courts and defend discrimination simply because discrimination is the tattered rag from which NOM wrings its financing. In a response filed late last week, the Beaver State's Attorney General makes NOM's motion to intervene sound as bunk as it really is:

6:13-cv-01834 #102 by Equality Case Files

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails