RECENT  POSTS:  » CA Republicans of 2015 do thing that will make CA Republicans of 2025 say, 'Yeah. Okay. so?' » NC activists choose name that sounds like Lifetime movie, plot that's discriminatory » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm) » Video: 'Vice' covers the sad, dangerous, discredited world of 'conversion therapy' » Buzzfeed: Jeb Bush's nascent team is teeming with gay Republicans » FRC prays against gay acceptance to 'avoid the wrath of God' » Video: Mark Cuban supports religious biz owners that 'just say no' to serving same-sex weddings » We're not driven by animus, say groups that are known for showing animus toward gay couples  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/05/2014

Read: Attorney General on why out-of-state NOM should keep its standing-deprived nose out of Oregon's business

by Jeremy Hooper

As you surely know, the National Organization For Marriage is trying to step into Oregon courts and defend discrimination simply because discrimination is the tattered rag from which NOM wrings its financing. In a response filed late last week, the Beaver State's Attorney General makes NOM's motion to intervene sound as bunk as it really is:

6:13-cv-01834 #102 by Equality Case Files

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails