RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/05/2014

Arkansas Family Council fights civil marriage by calling it 'sin'; kind of like fighting drivers' licensing with cries of 'porcupine!'

by Jeremy Hooper

The marriage debate is annoying for many reasons. Chief among them is the fact that our opposition is not even trying to have the same conversation as us:

ARKANSAS: An auspicious group of laymen, elected officials and over 100 Christian pastors in sharp black suits from around the state gathered on the steps of the Capitol to take a stand for the biblical principle of marriage between one man and one woman. Motivated by the judge’s ruling last week that redefined marriage, the group presented a united front to honor God and His Word, calling same-sex “marriage” a sin and wrong. Leaders were careful to reiterate God’s love and their love for people, but hatred of sin.
FULL:
Arkansas: Rousing Rally in Support of Biblical Marriage [Focus on the Family]

What do they think, that this judge and all future judges are going to be like, "Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, sin. Why didn't you all say so? Here this whole time I thought I was supposed to be deciding on civil marriage, which is detached from the optional religious ceremony, and that I was supposed to be basing my ruling in constitutional law rather than the widely varying faith opinions of this supposed church/state-separated nation. But now that you've reminded of your personal opinion involving 'sin,' I now see that I am to instead put an anti-gay evangelical pastor's Southern Evangelical Seminary training above my own legal degree."

I mean, I know that is what groups like the Arkansas Family Council would like to happen, as the "protect marriage" movement in American has more than made known its superiority complex and sheer disrespect for the crucial distinction between civil marriage and religious ceremony. But do they really think this sort of public engagement is going to change their fates? Adorable, if so. But no.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails