RECENT  POSTS:  » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/04/2014

NOM misspells Cory Booker's name, misrepresents his commitments

by Jeremy Hooper

The National Organization For Marriage's support for discrimination, its related policy, and its proponents would be one thing. But something I've always found particularly detestable about this organization is the inability to simply support their candidate and his or her commitment to carrying water for the marriage inequality cause. Instead, they always have to disparage the other person as being "anti-" known goods like marriage and family, no matter how ludicrous that idea.

This time it's US Senator Cory Booker, a very popular man who has dedicated his entire adult life to public service on behalf of New Jersey citizens and families. Without any evidence, NOM goes ahead and declares Corey [sic] Booker, who speaks often of his close relationship with his mother, to be "anti-marriage" and "anti-family":

Screen Shot 2014-06-04 At 1.55.03 Pm
[NOM]

I know that "anti-marriage" and "anti-family" have currency in the disingenuous world of social conservatism. But words and phrases have meaning. Neither NOM nor any other organization gets to casually toss around phrases like these without proper context.

A truly anti-marriage person would be somehow trying to limit the institution and its participants. Senator Booker is not. Senator Booker is seeking more potential marriages, not less.

A truly anti-family person would be somehow trying to tear apart America's functional households. Senator Booker is not. As longtime mayor of Newark, he worked in difficult situations to make life better for families of that city. Now, as US Senator, he's extending that commitment to the entire state/nation. Just because NOM doesn't agree with all of his views on marriage does not give NOM the power to brand this man "anti-family." That is a serious charge from an organization that hasn't done one thing to earn the right to make it.

Such a toxic organization.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails