RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/30/2014

Video: Brian Brown's callers show weakness of his movement's arguments

by Jeremy Hooper

Below is an appearance that National Organization For Marriage president Brian Brown contributed to C-Span over the weekend. Other than coming closer to supporting the idea of gay "change" than I've heard from him in a while (at around the 33:00 mark) or denying that he's a religious leader (at around 22:00; and ha!), Brian's talking points are fairly standard and reliably unconvincing. No surprise there.

What I find most interesting is how throughly off-base and uninformed his supportive callers are. One of the callers begins and ends her case for opposing marriage equality at "it's my opinion." Another suggests same-sex couples get a completely separate word and custom that's pointedly detached from marriage. Yet another says that marriage is a biblical word and that courts should say that it is, even though it's (a) not and (b) we are talking about civil marriage equality, which is always detached from the optional religious ceremony. And then there's the caller who portrays "same-sex attraction" as a choice, sparking the tentative "ex-gay" support from Brian that I mentioned earlier. The sum of the parts tells you all you need to know about the anti-equality movement's court losses. They simply can't win in any forum with a standard higher than NOM press release and a willingness to swallow it.

Watch as much or as little as you'd like:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails