RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/30/2014

Video: Brian Brown's callers show weakness of his movement's arguments

by Jeremy Hooper

Below is an appearance that National Organization For Marriage president Brian Brown contributed to C-Span over the weekend. Other than coming closer to supporting the idea of gay "change" than I've heard from him in a while (at around the 33:00 mark) or denying that he's a religious leader (at around 22:00; and ha!), Brian's talking points are fairly standard and reliably unconvincing. No surprise there.

What I find most interesting is how throughly off-base and uninformed his supportive callers are. One of the callers begins and ends her case for opposing marriage equality at "it's my opinion." Another suggests same-sex couples get a completely separate word and custom that's pointedly detached from marriage. Yet another says that marriage is a biblical word and that courts should say that it is, even though it's (a) not and (b) we are talking about civil marriage equality, which is always detached from the optional religious ceremony. And then there's the caller who portrays "same-sex attraction" as a choice, sparking the tentative "ex-gay" support from Brian that I mentioned earlier. The sum of the parts tells you all you need to know about the anti-equality movement's court losses. They simply can't win in any forum with a standard higher than NOM press release and a willingness to swallow it.

Watch as much or as little as you'd like:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails