RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor » NOM resorts to blatant lying in its 2015 #March4Marriage materials » NOM coalition partner: America will fall unless you March For Marriage » AFA helps SCOTUS see that opposition to *civil* marriage equality is all about religious fervor » Video: Did this Texas 'biblical marriage' rally assemble least diverse crowd in recorded human history? » About those children of fractured families who keep blaming same-sex parenting for their issues... » Ha! NOM uses ad for a desk to represent president's real office  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/30/2014

Video: Brian Brown's callers show weakness of his movement's arguments

by Jeremy Hooper

Below is an appearance that National Organization For Marriage president Brian Brown contributed to C-Span over the weekend. Other than coming closer to supporting the idea of gay "change" than I've heard from him in a while (at around the 33:00 mark) or denying that he's a religious leader (at around 22:00; and ha!), Brian's talking points are fairly standard and reliably unconvincing. No surprise there.

What I find most interesting is how throughly off-base and uninformed his supportive callers are. One of the callers begins and ends her case for opposing marriage equality at "it's my opinion." Another suggests same-sex couples get a completely separate word and custom that's pointedly detached from marriage. Yet another says that marriage is a biblical word and that courts should say that it is, even though it's (a) not and (b) we are talking about civil marriage equality, which is always detached from the optional religious ceremony. And then there's the caller who portrays "same-sex attraction" as a choice, sparking the tentative "ex-gay" support from Brian that I mentioned earlier. The sum of the parts tells you all you need to know about the anti-equality movement's court losses. They simply can't win in any forum with a standard higher than NOM press release and a willingness to swallow it.

Watch as much or as little as you'd like:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails