RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/25/2014

Video: #March4Marriage attendees 'don't hate' us enough to tell us we're wrong, unequal, in need of 'the truth'

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2014-06-25 At 8.59.08 Am Just like last year, when she pushed the claim that there were 15,000 people at a march that featured about 12,000 less than that, I'm sure Katie Yoder of the anti-gay Media Research Center thought she was helping when she and her team put together this video of carefully selected March For Marriage attendees expressing their "love" for gay people. But considering virtually all of them make it clear that their form of "love" involves "saving" gay people from ourselves, she actually manages to exacerbate the harms that NOM's little stunt brought to the larger "protect marriage" movement.

The clip:

It's so annoying the way the anti-equality crowd used this "we love them enough to..." line as some sort of an escape chute. While some of them surely mean it (or at least think they do), the intent within their heart is not the point here. The point is that they are pushing policy that strips us of civil rights and ideas that, if carried out to their logical ends, would "free" us from our sexual orientations. Whether that is done with a smile or an angry placard, it is still wrong. And harmful. And offensive.

It is sweepingly clear that the majority of attendees at NOM's little PR stunt were there because they don't think people should be gay. Period. And as Americans, they have a right to believe that, just as NOM as a right to advocate in that way. But they have to start owning it.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails