RECENT  POSTS:  » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out » But your subjective view of 'real' marriage is factually irrelevant, Ryan » Flip Benham (yes, their dad) reportedly protesting outside NC weddings » TV's Duggar family continues anti-LGBT activism » Caught ya: Far-right's latest marriage 'victim' edited website to make more solid legal case » Read: Wyoming to become our 32nd marriage equality state » GLAAD: Victory is what happens while you're busy making other plans » What fake victimization sounds like in Arizona » Federal judge strikes Arizona's discriminatory marriage ban; marriages should begin today! » NOM's latest desperation: Relying on hearsay James O'Keefe video to smear Democrat for 'secretly' not opposing equality  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/25/2014

Maggie Gallagher: Sexual orientation is 'more akin to religion' than to race

by Jeremy Hooper

My pal John Corvino has written a compelling essay for Commonweal magazine titled "Thinking Straight?" which is running with the subtitle, "Where Social Conservatives Go Wrong on Sexuality." Social conservative Maggie Gallagher responds to Corvino's piece by going wrong on sexuality:

Here’s my view: When Christians tell me that homosexuality is “socially constructed” and therefore not a “real” permanent feature of human existence, I generally respond “I know gay people exist the same way that I know that Methodists exist. I’ve met them.”

In other words, not all categories that are real are founded on fixed unchangeable essences. Sexual orientation as a concept is a way of organizing “given reality” (sexual attraction) into a communal identity, the strongest kind. It is therefore not at all like race, and but rather more akin to religion.

I never ever think of myself as a heterosexual, nonetheless my own ideas about my experience of sexuality (“we are born male and female and called to come together in love in this thing called marriage”) are core enough to my identity and my sense of what is required for communal good that I am willing to suffer rather than renounce them, if necessary. They are not positions I hold, they are part of who I am.
FULL:
Maggie Gallagher

What a convenient load of hooey!

Maggie doesn't ever think of herself as heterosexual? So what? Who cares? What does that change? If she is, in fact, heterosexual (and I have no reason to
Screen Shot 2014-07-25 At 9.22.02 Am
question that she is anything other than that), then she can go around identifying herself with whatever label she wants. Even if she labels her sexuality as "Bermuda in the Springtime," it doesn't change her truth.

And Maggie even seems to realize that her sexuality is "part of who I am"—she just insists on complicating things. And why? Well, secause she needs to disorder the information stream in order to justify her Catholic-motivated biases against same-sex love. The conservative Catholic view is that yes, same-sex attraction exists, but that gay people are not really a thing. Conservative Catholics refuse to accept the scientific consensus on sexual orientation, instead demanding that we are all essentially ordered toward heterosexual love and that anything that skews off that one and only "true" path is meant to be altered or, more likely, suppressed. That is essentially what Maggie is saying here, just in her typically overwrought way.

And great, it's fine for her to believe whatever she wants about what it means to be gay, so far as it goes. But just because her chosen religion has set her mind in this way, she cannot insist that we all buy into it. I don't personally believe that sexual orientation is exactly like race, just like sex is not like left-handedness is not like ethnicity is not like eye color. Each characteristic is unique with its own structure and gradation and nuance. But I do know, for a fact, that sexual orientation is not "more akin to religion" than it is to other biological realities that make up a person. Religion is 100% chosen—always, every time, in every instance, with every person. No matter how strongly convicted one may be or how deep his or her familial roots might be entwined with a particular denomination, every single man and woman on this planet makes a deliberate choice about whether or not he or she will adhere his or her life to the tenets of a particular faith. And it's a day-by-day choice, at that. At any point, people can (and do) decide to reconsider the words of their holy books; even in cultures were there might be physical limitations (if not threats) for relinquishing a particular faith view, mentally stepping away from a religion requires little more than saying, "okay, done with that."

To suggest that a person's sexual orientation is even closely related to a person's chosen religion is downright ludicrous. To be honest, it's really not worthy of serious intellectual discussion.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails