RECENT  POSTS:  » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/30/2014

NOM finally admitting that marriage amendments are, in fact, bans

by Jeremy Hooper

For years the National Organization For Marriage ran a section on its site demanding supporters never use the word "ban" when referring to marriage amendments since they know that honest language made them sound bad. Apparently times have change:

Screen Shot 2014-07-30 At 3.05.04 Pm

Closer to honest, NOM! Now append the word "discrimination" to the end of your organizational moniker and we'll all enjoy a more honest debate culture.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails