RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/09/2014

Utah marriage case fast-tracked to SCOTUS

by Jeremy Hooper

Could June of 2015 be a particularly jubilant Pride Month?

Screen Shot 2014-07-09 At 2.57.31 Pm
Screen Shot 2014-07-09 At 2.58.08 Pm
Screen Shot 2014-07-09 At 2.58.00 Pm

I'm not willing to concede a 5–4 ruling the way that SCOTUSblog is. I still think Roberts, whose legacy as Chief Justice is as stake, is very gettable.

Then again, the court could not take this particular case at all. Or any case, for that matter. There are no guarantees other than that Antonin Scalia will always rule against us.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails