RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


No, I'm not kidding: NOM is pushing a *new* Regnerus study

by Jeremy Hooper

Now that Mark Regnerus' incredibly flawed study on same-sex parenting (which really didn't study same-sex parenting at all) has been laughed out of multiple courts of law, torn apart by credible researchers everywhere, and throughly demolished for the far-right concocted spin that it is, the National Organization For Marriage has finally moved on from it. Moved on to—another Regnerus study with an anti-gay bent!

I'm not sharting you:

Screen Shot 2014-08-11 At 2.46.37 Pm
[FULL(ish): NOM]

It's obvious what this latest one is about: they are trying to scare conservatives into believing that supporting same-sex marriage leads to loosened "standards" all around. The far-right conservatives who oppose our rights are desperate to make headway within more mainstream conservative circles on issues that they know are more palatable (and poll-tested) than marriage inequality. The answer, they believe, is to make it seem like a nation that supports same-sex marriage is one that will also support things that even same-sex marriage–backing Republicans might oppose, with abortion being the most obvious. That's why you keep hearing them try to connect marriage rulings to Roe v. Wade rather than their other, much more obvious, much more accurate judicial precedents and parallels. They are desperate for a bigger tent.

It's also become obvious over the past two years that Mark Regnerus is himself an anti-gay conservative. He now regularly appears at conservative conferences and on fringe radio shows where he tells conservatives how to stand up against "evil." And of course he's also gone on record (during one of these conservative speaking gigs) claiming that same-sex marriage will lead to more straight men straying from their wives, so it's no surprise to see he, a bona fide activist, going down this "slippery slope" path.

But what's most obvious is just how shockingly out of touch the National Organization For Marriage truly is. I mean, another Regnerus study? Seriously? For reals? Couldn't they at least have found another researcher willing to do their bidding? Are they that obtuse? That out-of-touch? Too resigned to the fact that they've already lost and simply no longer care about their now-laughable reputation?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails