RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


No, I'm not kidding: NOM is pushing a *new* Regnerus study

by Jeremy Hooper

Now that Mark Regnerus' incredibly flawed study on same-sex parenting (which really didn't study same-sex parenting at all) has been laughed out of multiple courts of law, torn apart by credible researchers everywhere, and throughly demolished for the far-right concocted spin that it is, the National Organization For Marriage has finally moved on from it. Moved on to—another Regnerus study with an anti-gay bent!

I'm not sharting you:

Screen Shot 2014-08-11 At 2.46.37 Pm
[FULL(ish): NOM]

It's obvious what this latest one is about: they are trying to scare conservatives into believing that supporting same-sex marriage leads to loosened "standards" all around. The far-right conservatives who oppose our rights are desperate to make headway within more mainstream conservative circles on issues that they know are more palatable (and poll-tested) than marriage inequality. The answer, they believe, is to make it seem like a nation that supports same-sex marriage is one that will also support things that even same-sex marriage–backing Republicans might oppose, with abortion being the most obvious. That's why you keep hearing them try to connect marriage rulings to Roe v. Wade rather than their other, much more obvious, much more accurate judicial precedents and parallels. They are desperate for a bigger tent.

It's also become obvious over the past two years that Mark Regnerus is himself an anti-gay conservative. He now regularly appears at conservative conferences and on fringe radio shows where he tells conservatives how to stand up against "evil." And of course he's also gone on record (during one of these conservative speaking gigs) claiming that same-sex marriage will lead to more straight men straying from their wives, so it's no surprise to see he, a bona fide activist, going down this "slippery slope" path.

But what's most obvious is just how shockingly out of touch the National Organization For Marriage truly is. I mean, another Regnerus study? Seriously? For reals? Couldn't they at least have found another researcher willing to do their bidding? Are they that obtuse? That out-of-touch? Too resigned to the fact that they've already lost and simply no longer care about their now-laughable reputation?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails