RECENT  POSTS:  » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house » AL Chief Justice Roy Moore calls marriage equality worse than segregation decision » And by opposition 'from all sides,' FRC means exclusively from the (R) side » Video: What it looked like when that thing happened today » Hillary vows to keep fighting for full LGBT equality; et tu, GOP rivals? » NOM, now truly nuts, encourages Americans to treat marriage equality ruling like Dred Scott  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/05/2014

NOM chair: Marriage equality rulings are 'like we're in Stalinist Russia'

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2014-04-21 At 8.58.55 PmThere's something fascinating going on with the anti-LGBT activists. On one hand, they are in a perpetual state of "victimhood" in which they claim all of their freedoms are under siege. But at the same time, they are disproving their own claims by continually demonstrating that America is still very much a place where folks have the freedom to speak as much hyperbole as they like:

“We keep making the argument of the importance of marriage, that it takes a man and a woman to make a child and that the state can’t continue to redefine that if civilization’s policy goal is to support families rather than water down marriage to be about any adult relationship,” said former Chapman University Law School dean John Eastman, a constitutional law scholar and chairman of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). “These judges keep saying that’s not what marriage is. Based on what? It’s like we’re in Stalinist Russia.”
FULL: Same-sex marriage foes hope to turn tide at mega-hearing in Cincinnati [Al Jazeera America]
(h/t: J.M.G.)

Stalin's Russia was defined by top-down demands to which the citizenry had to subscribe sans proper checks and balances. If anyone is more ably invoking that spirit, it's John Eastman and anyone else who demands that marriage must be one thing—and one thing only!—despite what proper court (and other) tests have proven.

I so "love" how these poor, poor practitioners of the pro-discrimination movement now overlook the years of freedom-robbing they so proudly waged at our expense so that they can portray themselves as the maligned. I very much remember when they enthusiastically applauded court (and all other) developments that went their way, coupled with the suggestion that these anti-LGBT markers made us more American. But now, since they are on the opposite end of fate, they take all outcomes that cast an unfavorable shadow onto their cause and spin them into something unsavory. Something untoward. It's not enough for them to just express disapproval or even vengeance—they have to suggest that these same kinds of developments, when they play out our way rather than theirs, are akin to actual historical blights.

It's bad history. From sore losers.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails