RECENT  POSTS:  » #RFRA and a movement that shirks responsibility (almost) as much as it shirks equality » Audio: Limbaugh admits #RFRA fight is about same-sex marriage; links homosexuality to bestiality » Sen Schumer, federal #RFRA coauthor, knocks down lie that Indiana's version is the same » Video: I can't fathom invoking concentration camps in my political discourse. But Glenn Beck on the other hand... » Get a load of this double-talk from the Family Research Council #RFRA #Indiana » NOM admits 'religious freedom' bills are about discriminating against same-sex couples; thanks, NOM » 'Indianapolis Star' to Governor Pence: FIX THIS NOW » Bill Maher's monologue on dialogue he'd prefer remain a monologue » Video: Even Michael Steele thinks Indiana law is too broad; Ryan T. Anderson constantly interrupts, still loses » Watch Gov. Pence heap praise on lobbying group that admitted #SB101 was all about same-sex marriage  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/04/2014

Read: Catholic Bishops back tax-subsidized adoption discrimination (*and alienating even more young people, apparently)

by Jeremy Hooper

They've already spent the past couple of years going after civil marriage equality and fair employment protections, so what are the top dogs at the United Conference of Catholic Political Pundits Bishops up to now? Why they are pressing Congress to pass a measure that would allow religious adoption agencies to enjoy all of the perks that come from federal contracts (e.g. support drawn from your tax dollars) while selectively flouting non-discrimination laws that apply to prospective adoptive parents who happen to be LGBT:

Ltr to Kelly Re Catholic Bishops press for discriminatory adoption

Catholic Bishops press for discriminatory adoption

Or at least same-sex couples are the impetus; the actual measures would extend to just about anyone the faith-based-but-tax-supported agency decides it wants to exclude on this day. Insert your own morality test.

Parental qualification as the top criteria for adoption? Puh-leez! It's the number of in-house penises and vaginas that these Bishops and their like-minded allies want to elevate in order to limit their pool of prospective parents. Which they can do, actually—just not on Uncle Sam's dime!

***

**And of course where you have the Catholic Bishops, you have NOM. The anti-gay group is framing the license-to-discriminate measure as "Common Sense Legislation." Guess that sounded better than the "Because Gay Parents Will Break The Kid Bill"

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails