RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/01/2014

Read: Zack Ford smacks back Ryan Anderson's love of tax-subsidized discrimination

by Jeremy Hooper

Ryan Anderson's schtick is to pretend we're all too dense to understand his desire to exalt "religious freedom" above fair-minded policy that doesn't discriminate against certain kinds of taxpayers. I know for a fact that my buddy Zack Ford is anything but dense on this or most any other issue of import.

Here the topic is adoption and Ryan's insistence that religious agencies that receive state funding/subsidies deserve the "right" to enjoy this benefit while also pointedly discriminating against loving and capable adoptive parents (/taxpayers) who happen to be of the same-sex. Zack isn't having it:

Screen Shot 2014-08-01 At 9.26.57 Am
Screen Shot 2014-08-01 At 9.27.07 Am
Screen Shot 2014-08-01 At 9.27.14 Am-1

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails