« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »
12/07/2006
You don't want it? THEN DON'T HAVE IT!
In a lengthy piece in which he condemns both what he considers to be extreme "gay activists" and the less militant, monogamy-seeking "gay mainstream," Peter LaBarbera (pic.) of the so-called "Americans For Truth" says today of the latter queer grouping:
Regularizing sin (deviance) or repackaging it to appear more like normal heterosexual relationships does not make it right.
For those tempted to embrace homosexual monogamy as an acceptable compromise, ask yourself: how do two men consummate their “gay marriage”?
The likelihood that you don’t even want to think about answering that question bespeaks the evilness of organized homosexuality and the illicit nature of all “gay” sex. Supporting “civil unions” as a compromise is merely a capitulation to an agenda that seeks to enshrine wrong and sometimes deadly behavior as a “good” for society.
To which we reply:
Oh, it's really quite simple, Peter: Two newly married men consummate their love by having sex. If you want a description of what that sex entails, Mr. LaBarbera, feel free to contact this writer at [email protected]. I will gladly describe the intimate workings of male/male coupling to you, if it would tickle your pickle. Now, personally I don't want to even think about what a heterosexual couple does on their wedding night, as heterosexual intercourse is not my cup of tea. I've actually had it on more than one occasion, so I KNOW more than many gay men that it is, in fact, not my cup of tea! But just because my sheer non-desire for the coitus makes me shun the mental picture of two straights bumpin' it, my lack of craving for opposite-sex coital imagery doesn't "bespeak the evilness" of straight sex. On that same token, Mr. LaBabs, just because you (presumably) don't want to picture two guys embroiled in hot, steamy lovemaking, it says nothing about the nature of the act itself. It simply says that your biological yearnings differ from my own.
It's actually a surprisingly weak argument for you to warn those who are "tempted to embrace homosexual monogamy as an acceptable compromise" to just envision gay sex in order to change their mind. Because the last time we checked, we weren't inviting any straight folks who disapprove of us into our bedrooms! If we had to think about the private consummations of each and every couple before we could "accept" them and their love, our dinner parties would be pretty lonely and our parents would never see us again. But we're not asking for you guys and gals to get turned on by our copulation, Petey! We're only asking that you respect that many of us view your form of sex in much the same light that you view ours!
For you see, Mr. LaBabs: Some men simply don't like tea; they prefer "Joe."
We're not "regularizing sin or repackaging it to appear more like normal heterosexual relationships." We're repackaging antiquated, demonizing thought so that it will appear more decent!
“Creating Change,” Corrupting Children: the ‘Gay’ Task Force’s Evil Agenda [AFT]
Technorati Tags: Peter LaBarbera
comments powered by Disqus
