« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


Giving 'Vet's comment a good vetting

by Jeremy Hooper

Well it's official, folks: We have a new titleholder in the race for most nutty/disjointed/ G-A-Y comment of all time!

A Liberal usage of slurs. Some bizarre threats against gay people. A failure to understand that our "American Family Association," "Traditional Values Coalition," and "McDonald's boycott" categories are actually in opposition to those groups and ideas. An out-of-place dig at the expense of Rosie O'Donnell's views and size. And then to top it all off, a stipulation that the "comments are not to be reproduced in any fashion, electronic, print, OTA, or otherwise without expressed written consent," under the threat of criminal persecution (even though (a) he has submitted them to OUR SITE and therefore made them our property, and (b) basic constitutional freedoms very much give us the right to convey the sent message)!

All these and more have led ST5Vet to the top stop in the Good As You Hall of Intentionally Threatening Yet Unintentionally Hysterical Comments:

Picture 1-180

We look forward to your lawsuit, ST5Vet!!!!

*The post where the comment appeared: Margie Phelps: Christians 'selling Sodomy' wholesale [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

He copyrighted his comments? <3

The comment sorta put a smile on my face at the stupidity, but it's not as funny when you realize how many people around the world share his/her viewpoint and are working hard to enforce them. Then it becomes kinda depressing.

Posted by: | Jul 14, 2008 12:22:18 PM

Teetering the line between laughter and tears: The definition of fighting the "culture wars" on the pro-gay side.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jul 14, 2008 12:29:30 PM

And he decides to comment on a post from back in January?

What amazes me is that apparently he/she has a LOT of time on their hands to be surfing the Internet for places where someone of their idology would not normally bother to go, AND enough time to compose such a long (if rambling and disjointed and misspelled and grammatically horrible as if written by a fourth-grader) response, yet apparently does not have the time to fully read and understand the post that (s)he's responding to.

Posted by: JWSwift | Jul 14, 2008 12:56:51 PM

The lack of a closing parentheses at the end of the comment cuts me deeply.

Posted by: Baldran | Jul 14, 2008 1:12:52 PM

Someone needs to ease up on the ack-cray ipe-pay, if you know what I mean.

Posted by: larry | Jul 14, 2008 1:53:26 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails