Good As You

You already have equality. A homosexual is allowd to marry. As long as it is not with someone of the same sex. A straight person has the same restrictions. It is equal. Nobody is stopping Homosexuals from marrying. Marriage is one man and one woman. A homosexual can marry, they just can't change the definition of marriage. No more then polygamy is allowed. A polygamist can get married, he just can't change the definition of marriage and marry multiple people. Anyone can get married.

You already have [religious freedom]. An (anti-)homosexual is allowd (sic) to [detest same-sex marriage]. As long as it is not [in a way that messes with the civil equality of someone of the same sex]. A straight person has the same restrictions. It is equal. Nobody is stopping (anti-)Homosexuals from [complaining about gays] marrying. Marriage is one man and one woman [, or it's between members of the same gender]. A homosexual can marry, they just can't change the definition of marriage[: which is why gays are seeking inclusion, not redefinition].

[Now comes the part where I will talk about a wholly unrelated issue for no particular reason:] No more then (sic) polygamy is allowed. A polygamist can get married, he just can't change the definition of marriage and marry multiple people.[/wholly unrelated rant]

Anyone can get married[: and soon gays nationwide will have the freedom to marry the one they love, rather than have sham hetero unions be their only option].

I'd like to know why people like Christopher think that's when valid argument today when it wasn't valid while they were using it against interracial marriage forty years ago.