« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/02/2009

'Yes on 1's nonsense: Rivaling foliage as ME's most easy-to-spot fall yield

by Jeremy Hooper

-The stock photos from a company with the (appropriate) phrase "monkey business" in its title.

-The lack of actual Mainers in the "yes on 1" ads.

-The issue of Charla Bansley, the private Christian school teacher, Concerned Women For America state director, and longtime friend of Maine's "pro-family" community who the "yes" campaign has deceptively positioned as a voice of Maine's public schools.

-The question of why the 8/13 Stand For Marriage rally was pointedly closed to any dissenting voice/media.


We've talked about all these things here at G-A-Y. But now in a new Portland Press Herald column, writer Bill Nemitz brings all of those issues as more to the mass of Mainers who don't read blogs:

The anti-repeal "No on 1" campaign overflows with real Mainers who are willing – no, make that eager – to go public in their support of equal marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples.

And the pro-repeal "Yes on 1" campaign? Not so much.

Real Mainers step up for 'No on 1' ads [PPH]

More than any campaign we've ever covered/worked on, this absolutely seems like one that our side cannot lose, just as long as a majority of Mainers are paying attention. We simply cannot see how SFMM's severely bumbled campaign (with more eyebrow-raisers every day) would ever sway an undecided voter. And in fact, the one-two punch of California and Maine (same script, different set of circumstances) might just become the double-hinged fulcrum that finally tips the marriage equality fight irreversibly towards our favor.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails